2026 Regular Season · WNBA PLAYER DOSSIER
ROTATION
G
Kara Dunn
Phoenix Mercury (PHX) · 4 GP (0 GS) · 15.0 MPG · Hollinger GmSc 5.2
POINTS (PPG)
6.5
4 GP (0 GS)
REBOUNDS (RPG)
1.5
Glass load
ASSISTS (APG)
0.5
0.2 TOPG
PTS+REB+AST (PRA)
8.5
Combined output
TRUE SHOOTING (TS%)
65.4%
63.2% eFG%
SHOOTING SPLITS
42.1% / 57.1%
100.0% FT · 2.0 3PM/G
STOCKS (STL / BLK)
0.2 / 0.0
Defensive disruption
HOLLINGER GMSC
5.2
15.0 MPG
Prop Hit-Rate Dossier (L5 · L10 · Season)
Over Hit Frequency vs Baseline Half-Point Line| Prop Market | Line | Season Avg | L5 Hit% | L10 Hit% | Season Hit% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points Over PTS | O 6.5 | 6.5 | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Rebounds Over REB | O 1.5 | 1.5 | 75% (3/4) | 75% (3/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Assists Over AST | O 0.5 | 0.5 | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Pts + Reb + Ast Over PRA | O 8.5 | 8.5 | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| 3-Pointers Made Over 3PM | O 2.5 | 2.0 | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
Situational & Recency Splits
L5 / L10 Form vs Home & Road Venue Splits| Split Window | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | PRA | 3PM | FG% | 3P% | TS% | GmSc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Season Average | 4 | 15.0 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 42.1% | 57.1% | 65.4% | 5.2 |
| Last 10 Games (L10) | 4 | 15.0 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 42.1% | 57.1% | 65.4% | 5.2 |
| Last 5 Games (L5) | 4 | 15.0 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 42.1% | 57.1% | 65.4% | 5.2 |
| Home Court Splits | 2 | 18.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 12.5 | 3.0 | 50.0% | 66.7% | 77.6% | 9.0 |
| Road Splits | 2 | 12.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 28.6% | 40.0% | 42.9% | 1.3 |
STARTER · 33.0 MPG
Kahleah Copper
G
21.5 PPG
3.7 RPG · 1.9 APG · 56.4% TS%
STARTER · 21.2 MPG
Kelsey Plum
G
15.8 PPG
1.8 RPG · 2.8 APG · 62.3% TS%
STARTER · 33.2 MPG
Alyssa Thomas
F
14.3 PPG
7.8 RPG · 8.5 APG · 56.5% TS%
STARTER · 27.6 MPG
DeWanna Bonner
F
10.6 PPG
6.1 RPG · 1.5 APG · 52.2% TS%
ROTATION · 20.1 MPG
Jovana Nogic
G
10.4 PPG
1.1 RPG · 1.6 APG · 61.2% TS%
STARTER · 23.4 MPG
Monique Akoa Makani
G
9.4 PPG
2.1 RPG · 2.5 APG · 58.8% TS%
STARTER · 22.7 MPG
Natasha Mack
F
8.9 PPG
6.7 RPG · 1.1 APG · 64.0% TS%
ROTATION · 15.6 MPG
Shay Ciezki
G
8.5 PPG
1.5 RPG · 1.6 APG · 63.9% TS%
| Date | Opponent | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | PRA | STL | BLK | TOV | FG | 3PT | FT | GmSc | Box |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21 |
vs
DAL
|
W 87-86 | 17 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 11.4 | Box |
| Sep 19 |
@
DAL
|
L 82-87 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0.6 | Box |
| Sep 17 |
@
POR
|
W 94-91 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2.0 | Box |
| Aug 29 |
vs
TOR
|
W 101-69 | 19 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 6.7 | Box |